Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
5.
Cancer Research ; 82(4 SUPPL), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1779442

ABSTRACT

The optimal timing of commencing adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) relative to adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) (i.e. concurrent with or sequential to radiotherapy) remains unknown. A systematic review performed by our team was unable to answer this question due to a lack of high quality, randomized data on concurrent versus sequential ET and RT. Surveys of physicians confirmed this uncertainty and highlighted theoretical concerns for increased side effects with concurrent treatment. Respondents showed keen interest in obtaining real world, randomized data to guide clinical practice. REaCT-RETT is a pragmatic, randomized, non-inferiority trial comparing concurrent and sequential ET and RT in early breast cancer (EBC). The primary endpoint will assess the change in ET side effects at baseline and 3 months post radiation, using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Endocrine Subscale (FACT-ES), with primary analysis based on an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). With a sample size of 176 patients (88 per arm), an ANCOVA would have 80% power (α=0.05) to detect effect sizes as small as 0.25 regardless of the correlation with covariates. It is hypothesized that concurrent therapy will be non-inferior to sequential therapy in terms of ET side effects. Secondary endpoints will examine RT toxicity, ET compliance, quality of S life, and cost-effectiveness. Patients with HR positive EBC planned to receive both adjuvant ET and RT were eligible. Patients who previously received ET for invasive breast cancer, or RT in the same breast, were excluded. The trial is conducted by The Ottawa Hospital's (TOH) innovative Rethinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) program (https://react.ohri.ca/) which strives to improve access to patient-centered, pragmatic clinical trials by removing barriers for patients and researchers. Integral features of the program include broad eligibility criteria, a verbal consent model, and pragmatic data collection and assessment procedures. REaCT is the largest pragmatic cancer clinical trials program in Canada, with over 3, 200 patients randomized in 18 clinical trials at 15 sites across Canada. REaCT-RETT accrued patients from September 2019 to January 2021. Data collection is ongoing, with final patient follow up expected April 2022. The timing of accrual provided a unique opportunity to adapt in response to restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which began to impact trial sites in March 2020. The target sample size was met with 262 patients randomized (1:1) across 3 sites in Ontario, 98% from TOH. A mean of 19 patients/month were accrued prior to the pandemic, compared to a mean of 13 patients/month after March 2020. Twenty-two patients were removed due to withdrawal of consent, ineligibility, or physician choice, and the pandemic was not a significant contributing factor. Since March 2020 there have been 772 patient follow ups, of which 47% (364/772) have been virtual. Only 10% (102/1028) of trial mandated appointments have been missed to date. Compliance with baseline and 3-month FACT-ES questionnaires for the primary endpoint in evaluable patients was 90% (215/240) and 83% (198/240), respectively. The pandemic posed several challenges to the REaCT-RETT study including a decline in patient accrual, poor accrual at peripheral sites due to delayed opening, and a rapid switch to virtual patient care. However, the nimble REaCT methodology enabled virtual patient consent and data collection during the pandemic, allowing the trial to continue successfully, with final data expected for presentation summer 2022. Finally, despite the challenges of COVID-19 we have seen that patients and physicians remain interested in research, and we are applying valuable lessons learned to forthcoming REaCT trials to strengthen their performance during and beyond the ongoing pandemic.

6.
Cytotherapy ; 23(5):S55, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1368862

ABSTRACT

Background & Aim: The Cellular Immuno-Therapy for COVID-19 related ARDS (CIRCA-19) was a phase 1, single site, dose escalation trial using a 3+3+3 design to determine the safety and maximum feasible tolerated dose of intravenously delivered, freshly cultured UC-MSCs. Nine patients, each receiving repeated unit doses of UC-MSCs over 3 consecutive days, were enrolled into 3 dose panels: Panel 1: 25×106 cells/dose (cumulative dose: 75×106 MSCs);Panel 2: 50×106 cells/dose (cumulative dose: 150×106 MSCs);Panel 3: up to 90×106 cells/dose (cumulative dose: 270×106 MSCs). Methods, Results & Conclusion: UC-MSCs were isolated from cords of healthy term pregnancies delivered by C-section. Cords were mechanically and enzymatically digested, and UC-MSCs were propagated in xeno-free conditions for 2 weeks prior to cryopreservation in a cord specific cell bank. One fully validated cell bank was used in CIRCA-19 that was free of adventitious agents (HBV, HCV, HSV1/2, Parvo B19 and Retroviruses), had high viability (>95%) and MSC identity with positive expression (>95%) of CD73, CD90 and CD105 and negative expression (<5%) of CD14, CD19, CD34, CD45 and HLA-DR. UC-MSCs also demonstrated high proliferative capacity (EdU+ >45%;DBT = 22h) and enhanced IDO expression (ΔΔCq?>18) when treated with IFN-γ. For the final product, UC-MSCs were thawed, plated and cultured for 24 to 120 h before harvesting to produce a batch of the final drug product formulated as 2.5×106 fresh UC-MSCs/mL suspended in PlasmaLyte A containing 5% Human Albumin, to be infused within 48h. Batches were tested for viability, endotoxin level, ACE-2 expression, tissue factor activity, sterility and mycoplasma. Sixteen batches of UC-MSCs were produced for a total of 41 cell doses (16 doses of 25M;13 doses of 50M;12 doses of 90M cells each). Twenty-seven of the 41 doses (9 doses of 25M, 50M and 90M cells each) were used to treat trial participants. The remaining doses were used for stability studies. All drug products had high viability (> 95%), endotoxin levels of <0.2 EU/mL and tested negative for mycoplasma and bacterial contaminants. All UC-MSC batches were negative for ACE-2 expression (Cq?>35;GAPHD Cq: 15±2;no detectable levels by western blotting) and had tissue factor activity levels between 250-310pM. UC-MSC drug product was stable for up to 96h (>80% viability) and had?>90% viability up to 48h in all 3 dose panels. This study demonstrates the feasibility of manufacture and delivery of a multi-dose fresh cell product in an emergent ICU setting.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL